AbstractThis article examines the recent emergence of strategic genocide litigation before the International Court of Justice. Cases such as The Gambia v Myanmar, South Africa

v Israel, and Nicaragua v Germany illustrate a shift towards public-interest or lawfare-type proceedings initiated by states that are not themselves directly injured. [...]

AbstractThere is no explicit clause in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea regulating the advisory jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of

the Sea (ITLOS) as a full tribunal. Notwithstanding this absence, ITLOS has rendered advisory opinions, including in the latest Climate Change case. [...]

Serious harm in healthcare often results from systemic failures, yet criminal accountability remains largely addressed through homicide law, gross negligence manslaughter and

health-and-safety offences, frameworks that emphasise individual culpability and are ill-suited to addressing organisational failings. [...]

In X v The Lord Advocate, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the Crown cannot be vicariously liable for torts committed by judges. This case note critically

examines what could be viewed as two significant doctrinal shifts that were introduced by this ruling. [...]

Hotels are increasingly pursuing sustainability-oriented innovations that require the deployment of dynamic capabilities. Yet little scholarly attention has focused on the

nature of dynamic capabilities and their microfoundations in this industry setting. [...]